Lab 5 - Introduction to Projections


The purpose of this lab was to explore different coordinate projections. For the lab, I projected the counties of the state of Florida in three different coordinate systems: Albers, UTM 16 N and State Plane N. Upon visual inspection, the UTM and State Plane projections are slightly compacted and rotated counter clockwise when compared to the Albers projection. 

In order to see how this visual difference impacts the physical characteristics of the counties, I selected four counties distributed throughout the state – Alachua, Escambia, Miami-Dade and Polk – and compared their area in square miles. There are differences in area between the three projections for all counties. The greatest differences in area are for the two largest counties – Miami-Dade and Polk. In addition, the UTM projection has the biggest area difference for Polk County. From this analysis, I conclude that the UTM and State Plane distort the areas of some counties more than others, especially larger counties. The distortion could be a result of the way these projections are created. Both the UTM and State Plane projections are separated by zones and the zones might not connect together well without a distortion, especially for larger counties or ones outside the zone. This might be why the larger counties and the counties located more centrally and south like Miami-Dade and Polk, are the most distorted; perhaps they lie between or on opposite sides of the zones. Because of this and because Albers appears to be the projection preferred by FGDL, the Albers projection is most likely the best projection for the entire state of Florida. 

It is important to compare datasets in the same projections, because, as this exercise demonstrates, different projections of the same feature can distort characteristics of that feature. The results of spatial analyses on the same feature in different projections might not be true and might instead be a result of distortion created by the different projection.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Module 2: Coordinate Systems

Image
In this week's lab I explore different coordinate systems and projections in order to better understand the nature of distortions introduced by the systems. For the last part of the lab, I was tasked with selecting a state in the contiguous US and selecting an appropriate projection for the area. I selected the state of Wyoming as my area of interest. Wyoming has 4 State Plane zones and two UTM zones, so neither a single State Plane nor UTM system would work for this area without distorting the size or shape of the state. Therefore, the best coordinate system for this area is Custom Coordinate system. I chose NAD 1983 WyLam (Meters), a custom system specifically for the state of Wyoming, as the projected coordinate system. This coordinate system is a Lambert secant-case normal-aspect conic type projection which preserves shape and is appropriate for a general reference map. The standard parallels are placed at 41N and 45N, the boundaries of the state of Wyoming, which minimizes
Read more

Module 6: Proportional Symbol and Bivariate Choropleth Mapping

Image
The objectives of this week's lab was to explore proportional symbol and bivariate choropleth mapping techniques, as well as customizing legends for each technique. One of the data sets for this lab included positive and negative values. The final map utilizes proportional symbols to show both positive and negative values. This map is essentially two proportional symbol maps overlaid on each other, one for positive job growth and another for negative job growth, with the symbols for both variables sized the same. Utilizing proportional symbols to show both positive and negative values is an effective way to visualize areas that show the greatest and lowest values. These areas are easy to see quickly on the map and give the map reader a simple way to visualize the variable being mapped. Fig 1. Proportional symbol map using positive and negative values.  Another data set for this lab examined contained two data variables: percent of the US population in each state that is obe
Read more

Module 4: Color Concepts & Choropleth Mapping

Image
In this week's lab, I explored using color and selecting color ramps in ColorBrewer, as well as applying these concepts to create meaningful choropleth maps. I created a map of population change from 2010 to 2014 in Georgia counties. I normalized the data and produced a choropleth map of population change using a diverging color scheme with 6 classes divided around a midpoint of 0. Fig 1. Choropleth map of population change in Georgia counties using a diverging color scheme. For the Georgia population data set, I chose to divide the data set into 6 classes around a midpoint of 0: 3 showing a decrease in population and 3 showing an increase in the population. The classes were grouped based on a manual classification closely based on the Natural Break classification, where the midpoint was adjusted to 0 with the other groups unchanged. Natural Breaks classification creates classes based on similarities in values in the data, thereby revealing patterns in the data. By adjust
Read more