Week 10 - Vector Analysis 2

The purpose of this week's lab was to explore the most common modeling tools in ArcGIS - buffer and overlay - and create a script in ArcPy for the buffer tool to combine or exclude multiple vector features. The resulting map includes final possible campsite areas, after applying the overlay tools.  

First, I used the Buffer tool to create a feature class with a fixed distance. The resulting feature class included areas within 300 meters of roads, dissolving all buffer borders so that areas of overlap were merged. 

Next, I created a feature class with a variable distance from the water features (150 m for lakes and 500 m for rivers). To do this, I added a field to the attribute table of the water feature that included the desired buffer distance for each feature type, and then I used the Buffer tool with these fields as the buffer distance and dissolve type. I also used ArcPy to create a script to use the Buffer tool to create feature classes with variable buffer distances from the roads feature class. 

Next, I used the Union tool to merge the roads buffer and water buffer feature classes. Before using this tool, I prepared the buffer layers by adding a field to each attribute table defining the areas near the roads and water. These fields were called "insd_rbuf" and "insd_wbuf", respectively, and assigned a value of 1, i.e. "yes." I used the Union tool to combine the buffer areas. I then selected the records where the "insd_" fields equaled 1 in the resulting union and created a feature class from the selection. 

Finally, to exclude areas within conservation areas from the new union feature class, I used the Erase tool. The resulting feature class was a multipart layer, meaning that selecting one polygon, selected many features in the layer. I preferred to isolate each polygon within the layer, which meant creating a singlepart layer. To do this, I used the Mutltipart to Singlepart tool. In addition, I added an Area field to the final attribute table and used the Calculate Geometry function to calculate the area in hectares for all the polygons in the final layer.

Because the final map represents possible campsites between two wilderness areas and the likely audience for the map would be outdoor enthusiasts interested in the topography of the area, I elected to use a USA Topo Map as the basemap.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Module 2: Coordinate Systems

Image
In this week's lab I explore different coordinate systems and projections in order to better understand the nature of distortions introduced by the systems. For the last part of the lab, I was tasked with selecting a state in the contiguous US and selecting an appropriate projection for the area. I selected the state of Wyoming as my area of interest. Wyoming has 4 State Plane zones and two UTM zones, so neither a single State Plane nor UTM system would work for this area without distorting the size or shape of the state. Therefore, the best coordinate system for this area is Custom Coordinate system. I chose NAD 1983 WyLam (Meters), a custom system specifically for the state of Wyoming, as the projected coordinate system. This coordinate system is a Lambert secant-case normal-aspect conic type projection which preserves shape and is appropriate for a general reference map. The standard parallels are placed at 41N and 45N, the boundaries of the state of Wyoming, which minimizes
Read more

Module 6: Proportional Symbol and Bivariate Choropleth Mapping

Image
The objectives of this week's lab was to explore proportional symbol and bivariate choropleth mapping techniques, as well as customizing legends for each technique. One of the data sets for this lab included positive and negative values. The final map utilizes proportional symbols to show both positive and negative values. This map is essentially two proportional symbol maps overlaid on each other, one for positive job growth and another for negative job growth, with the symbols for both variables sized the same. Utilizing proportional symbols to show both positive and negative values is an effective way to visualize areas that show the greatest and lowest values. These areas are easy to see quickly on the map and give the map reader a simple way to visualize the variable being mapped. Fig 1. Proportional symbol map using positive and negative values.  Another data set for this lab examined contained two data variables: percent of the US population in each state that is obe
Read more

Module 4: Color Concepts & Choropleth Mapping

Image
In this week's lab, I explored using color and selecting color ramps in ColorBrewer, as well as applying these concepts to create meaningful choropleth maps. I created a map of population change from 2010 to 2014 in Georgia counties. I normalized the data and produced a choropleth map of population change using a diverging color scheme with 6 classes divided around a midpoint of 0. Fig 1. Choropleth map of population change in Georgia counties using a diverging color scheme. For the Georgia population data set, I chose to divide the data set into 6 classes around a midpoint of 0: 3 showing a decrease in population and 3 showing an increase in the population. The classes were grouped based on a manual classification closely based on the Natural Break classification, where the midpoint was adjusted to 0 with the other groups unchanged. Natural Breaks classification creates classes based on similarities in values in the data, thereby revealing patterns in the data. By adjust
Read more